The labor government has proposes a constitution for National Health Service on the lines of BBC charter. This radical charter is backed by the Prime Minister Tony Blair and his next in command Gordon Brown. The present charter proposal is in direct response to the strike by NHS logistics staff, its first in nearly two decades who fear that privatization will result in job cuts which will directly affect them.

The constitution would determine the boundaries over the extent of privatization of the system. According to Health Minister Andy Burnham “Our vision for the NHS should be a system in which the funding and policy framework is set centrally by ministers, but the service has more operational independence at a local and regional level to carry through necessary changes”.

Problems with NHS

Even though it is a completely state run system, it has same problems that the American system is facing at present like shortage of physicians and support staff, long waiting for the treatment, inadequate treatment incase of high risk and complicated disease, lack of hygiene standards in the hospital and problems in getting preventive medicines.

Most experts in Britain believe that this commercialization of the NHS will jeopardize patient care and put financial interests before medication like in America, where 16 percent of the GDP is spend on Health care still there are 42 million people uncovered compare to Britain which spends only 11 percent of the GDP on healthcare and still able to cover all its people.

Kevin Carter is a contributing writer to Write Term Papers. He writes current affairs and political college term papers. You can order a custom healthcare powerpoint presentation at Write Term Papers.

Share This

Just about all health care providers have need of stethoscopes. Whether you’re a nurse, respiratory therapist or a medical doctor, the need to auscultate the chest, lungs and heart is a necessary and important part of your work. In deciding from the many stethoscopes to choose from it’s important to keep in mind what you’ll be using your stethoscope for. For general purpose listening, stethoscopes are excellent tools and come at a very good price.

Cardiologist may like to choose from stethoscopes that can record sounds that can later be played back on their computer.

Comfort when using stethoscopes.

Many people don’t realize that a stethoscope and actually be uncomfortable to use if the ear pieces are not soft. Obtaining the right ear piece that is soft and comfortable is very important if you plan to use your equipment frequently.

Generally, the thicker the tube, the better sound conduction you’ll experience. stethoscopes come in both single and double tube models. The single tube splits into two separate tubes while the double tube model stethoscopes send sound waves to each ear through a single tube, possible allowing for better sound interpretation.

If you work in the health care field you’ll need medical supplies to help you with your work. Quality products that you know you can depend on will give you greater confidence during stressful situations.

About The Author

Mike Yeager, Publisher

http://www.a1-medical-supplies-4u.com/

mjy610@hotmail.com

Share This

We spend 2-3 times as much on our healthcare as most of the countries that now have “socialized medicine”. Yet, every country with socialized medicine has much better overall health statistics. As a matter fact, we are hovering around 32nd in the world. Even some “third world” countries are ahead of us.

How can this be? The richest country in the world, spending more than any other country, yet the health is one of the worst! What’s wrong? How have we come to this state of affairs?

There are a variety of reasons. Let’s look at some of these, and look at the alternate answer:

1. There’s a lot of talk about 40-50 million “uninsured” people in the US. “Uninsured” doesn’t mean that they aren’t taken care of. No Emergency Room can turn down anyone who comes for “treatment”. (Although many hospitals try to shift “poor” people to county or state facilities for profits sake.)

There’s also Medicaid for the very poor. But, that still leaves the great majority of “uninsured” swinging in the wind. They make just a little too much money to qualify for Medicaid, or the state they live in has run out of money and facilities. (Under the Bush Administration, the cuts in Medicaid have limited this coverage in virtually every state.) A severe medical problem bankrupts many of these families every year.

Who pays for Medicare and Emergency visits? The usual - US taxpayers! So, like it or not, we already have a “sort of” socialized medicine.

By the way, when did the phrase “socialized medicine” become a bad phrase? (Was it another “spin” fostered by “vested interests”?) How often have you heard “just ask a Canadian about their socialized medicine”?

Ask 100 persons from any country(s) that has socialized medicine two questions: “How do you like it?” and “Would you like to get rid of it”.

The answers to the first question are often a lot of individual complaining. Yet, the answer to the second question is an overwhelming “Never”. Could this dichotomy be the reason that so many people in the US “think” that socialized medicine is bad - those “bitching” (and very human) answers. Most people ask only the first question, NOT the second. I’ve asked both, and have yet to find a Canadian or a Brit who answers “yes” to the second question, but many, or most, will find something to complain about.

Isn’t it interesting that all the “civilized industrial nations” in Europe and elsewhere have some version of socialized medicine? Even in almost bankrupt Russia and Georgia, healthcare is free to all. And, even their health statistics are better than ours. (FYI, they also subsidize any “bright” student all the way to a “doctorate” if they are smart enough. College tuition in the US is prohibitively high for mid and low income families - are we wasting a major resource? You bet!)

2. Why is our health care costing so much? Simple - the insurance companies are running it. They make huge profits for this “service”. Cut out the middleman - the insurance companies, and cut the costs by an impartial estimate between a third and a half!

What other benefits would this have? Doctors would have more time to talk to patients, and spend less time, and office staff filling out forms to get paid. When was the last time your MD spent more than 2 minutes with you?

Let’s not overlook the fact that prevention is always better than catastrophe! All too often, when a poor person winds up in an Emergency Room, the cost of their problem is much more than it would be if that person had had insurance that allowed doctor visits to head off catastrophe with some prevention. This is a major factor favoring socialized medicine.

There’s still another factor in this equation. Malpractice insurance (more profits to insurance companies)! We do need to limit this. Some formulas have to be developed for how much any doctor can be sued for. And, medical boards need to oversee MD’s (and their mistakes) much closer. Doctors do make mistakes! And, the injured have a right to be compensated for such! What do the other countries do about this problem? Has anyone made any study of this?

3. There is another often overlooked problem. We, as a nation, have a terrible diet! We eat “fast foods” way too often. We eat too few “healthy foods”, and too many “high carbohydrate” foods. The statistics show clearly that a poor diet on the part of a mother results in a baby that is not nearly as healthy as it should be.

Take a look at some “poor” natives of African countries in photographs. Look especially at the wide mouths full of very strong, very even, teeth. Compare this to the US “standard” of two very prominent front teeth, a high narrow arch to the roof of the mouth, and crowding of the rest of the teeth. Dr Von Hilsheimer of Maitland Florida wrote a book years ago detailing the various “abnormalities” and “anomalies” of children of poor diet mothers. There is a definite correlation between these children and increasing allergy and sensitivity in our children

Recently I read a very interesting article about a school that changed the diets of the attending students, and by this simple change only, the entire attitude and moral outlook of the students was changed. It was very simple! They took out all the soda machines, and replaced them with water fountains. They eliminated hamburgers and fries, and similar poor diet foods, and emphasized fruits and veggies. Lo, and behold, the school which had previously been shunned by teachers because of unruly students was completely changed! Students were calm, quiet, and learned more and better than other schools in the area. Acts of violence or vandalism were eliminated. There are several other similar studies which school boards do not pay enough attention to.

As a result of our overall “poor” diet, we, as a nation, get sick more often than other countries. This adds to the cost of healthcare tremendously in this country.

4. The American Medical Assn, one of the strongest unions in the world, backed up by the huge drug industry (Big Pharma), and the insurance industry have the power and the money to “buy” enough politicians to prevent any “reasonable” health plan. Bill and Hilary Clinton found this out in his first year in office. There’s so much money involved, it may be impossible to even get anything done except a “Band-Aid” on the cancer.

What can we, as individuals, do? Start asking the politicians we elect what their previous votes have been, and what their future votes will be on these questions. Vote for those who will vote for at least a form of socialized medicine. And throw out the other rascals. Our votes are powerful, and we need to use them wisely.

Phil Bate PhD - Retired Orthomolecular Psychologist
Inventor and Patent Pending Holder for
Brain Wave Amplitude Changing via Auditory Training
http://DrBate.com

Share This