womenhealthcare.iwomenonline

Where Do You Begin Begin With the End in Mind!

May 20th, 2008 by admin

I know that many of you want to make things better at your sitemake things safer,
have your chronically ill patients become much healthier, get home on time from the
office consistently, and much more. So, where do you begin?!! I like the answer
given by Stephen Covey in “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People (if you haven’t
read it yet, I highly recommend it). He says to Begin with the End in Mind. What can
this mean? He states that all things are created twicefirst mentally and then
physically. So, the first step is to have a vision of what you want at your healthcare
site. Do you want to reduce infections 60%-70% if your site is an ICU? Studies at
the Institute for Healthcare Improvement show this is possible. If you are a primary
care physician, do you want to increase the income of your practice 10%-20%, leave
the office on time, and also dramatically improve the health of your patients? A
recent issue of Family Practice Management demonstrates how. If you have primary
contact with patients, do you want to consistently know all the prescriptions that
they take so as to avoid conflict in medication or other undesirable outcomes?
JHACO is requiring hospitals to reconcile medications for all their patients. A May
23, 2006 article in the Wall Street Journal discussed how hospitals are improving in
this area.

The point that I am making is to first have a clear vision of what you want to
achieve. You cannot make any long lasting improvements if you don’t have a clear
and detailed plan. As a builder needs a clear and precise blueprint in order to build
a property, so you too must have a clear vision.

You cannot have an achievable vision, though, without knowing what is possible.
Knowing what is possible will require that you become familiar with some quality
improvement tools. This will take some education on your part or the hiring of
someone with expertise. Don’t fall into the trap of the Management Flavor of the
Month, though; such a pitfall was recently discussed in a column by Carol Hymowitz
in a May 15 article in the Wall Street Journal. She stated that leaders often try
solutions that are popular at the momentLean, Six Sigma, etc. Rather, you should
find the tools from these and other management styles that you and others on the
staff can work with easily or that an expert can easily deploy at your site. The tools
you use should fit your site and the employees there. There are many good tools
available. Be sure to include ones that improve communication among all staff
members and patients. You might want to use a kaizen event, for instance. You
will want to find out how things exist in their present state so you can benchmark
your improvements. This will require some sort of mapping process and basic
statistical measures. Be sure to write a manual of the processes you adopt so that
new staff members have a ready reference on the practices you want to maintain.
These and many other tools can be found on the American for Quality’s web site as
well as the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s website.

If you hire a consultant to help, be sure that they are have a variety of tools
available. American Society of Quality certified quality engineers possess such
tools. Be sure this consultant is willing to guarantee the results the two of you
agree upon if you follow his/her recommendations.

What then, is your first step in creating dramatic improvements at your healthcare
site? Begin with the End in Mind and become familiar with a variety of comfortable
tools.

Donald Bryant helps healthcare providers meet their challenges and writes
“Making Good Healthcare Better” a free monthly ezine for healthcare
providers who want to dramatically improve patient health, improve the
bottom line, and make work more rewarding, guaranteed. Go now to
http://www.bryantsstatisticalconsulting.com to get a free article with tips you can
use to start making improvements immediately and to learn more about Lean Healthcare

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted in healthcare | No Comments »

Standardize Your Processes to Produce Best Results

May 3rd, 2008 by admin

Standardize your processes! You can save time, money and prevent errors. Things
you do over and over should be done the same way every time, if indeed you do the
task the best way. They say variety is the spice of life, but for healthcare processes
it certainly isn’t most of the time. Consider this, if you would. Would you buy your
favorite brand of soda if sometimes your 12 ounce can were 3/4 of the way full and
sometimes almost overflowing. Certainly not. You expect there to consistently be
nearly 12 ounces every time. How would a patient behave if the results of a
healthcare visit varied wildly? The patient would probably find a new provider. The
best healthcare providers deliver a consistently good service; it helps attract new
patients and keeps the old ones coming back.

Standardization helps save time. As things become routine, a process is easier to
do and is done more quickly. For instance, if a primary care physician makes sure
that the necessary items for a patient visit are always in the examining room, the
doctor won’t have to waste time going to look for supplies and waste time for the
patient or the doctor. I recommend that primary care physicians along with staff sit
down and list the things that should always be in examination rooms and make sure
someone is responsible for these items every morning before patients arrive. If this
is done, the doctor can save time, thereby enabling him or her to spend more
quality time with the patient or see more patients.

Standardization saves money. Most doctors face rising malpractice costs, but for
one group this has not been trueanesthesiologists. According to an article in the
June 21, 2005 edition of the Wall Street Journal, this group over two decades ago
began implementing procedures that ensured the safety of their patients. Certain
processes have been standardized across the profession so instead of one death per
5000 cases, there is now only one per 200000 to 300000 cases. Because of this,
their malpractice insurance premiums plummeted.

Standardization prevents errors, as in the above illustration. Another example is
drawn form a local hospital. Recently the Chief Financial Officer of the institution
and I were discussing the new facility they were building. Instead of building
adjacent rooms so that the bathrooms would be back to back to save plumbing
costs, each room was designed so that each room will be exactly the same with
bathrooms all on the same side. Why? This will prevent errors and in the long run
save money for the hospital.

It is best if you can measure standardization. The best tool to measure
standardization in statistics is variance or standard deviation. I am sure many of
you have encountered this measure, but probably cannot calculate it. The best way
to calculate it is either in a spreadsheet or on a calculator. For example, the
standard deviation for the numbers 8, 12, 1, 4 and 5 is 4.18. For the group 5, 5, 5,
5, and 5 the standard deviation is 0, since there is no variety. So, when you are
trying to standardize a process, see if you cannot find some significant measure
that reflects the process and try to reduce the standard deviation as much as
possible. In fact, this is the heart of Six Sigmareduce the standard deviation as
much as possible. The best manufacturers and service providers often use this tool.

Once you have standardized a process and have achieved a satisfactory standard
deviation, then write down the process in a manual that is a collection of all best
practices. This way, anyone who needs to reference how a process should be
conducted can refer to the manual. Too, it is an excellent training source for new
employees.

As you can see in these brief illustrations, standardization or the lack of variance
provides safety for patients, a savings of time for the provider and patient, and
contributes to an improved bottom line.

Mr. Bryant helps healthcare providers meet their challenges. He helps save
time, improve patient health, and improve the bottom line. He publishes a
monthly newsletter “Making Good Healthcare Better.” All of this is done from
the perspective of a certified quality engineer and statistician.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted in healthcare | No Comments »

Want to Make Tremendous Gains at Your Healthcare Site Use Process Mapping!

April 11th, 2008 by admin

I want to tell you some ways to eliminate waste at your medical site. Am I talking
about physical waste, like soiled bandages or used needles? No, I mean any action
that results in a poor or unintended outcome. I mean taking too long to accomplish
some outcome, like taking too long to get an operating room ready for the next
surgery. The National Institute of Health in “Crossing the Quality Chasm” stated
that any waiting time for a patient is a waste. A patient waiting past the time of his/
her scheduled appointment is an example. A patient having to wait too long to be
admitted to a hospital after being seen in the emergency room is an example of
poor processesa waste. A patient who develops an infection after being treated or
going through surgery is a good example of waste from unintended outcomes.
These are just a few examples. I am sure that you are aware of many more.

Japanese manufacturers are leaders in eliminating waste. One trick they use is to
send a new employee to the manufacturing floor and have him/her watch someone
performing a task; the new employee is told to watch until he/she sees a better way
to do the job. These manufacturers know that the time spent doing this will save
more time and money in due time. Hospitals and healthcare sites are not
manufacturing plants, though. Yet many of the same principals can be applied. The
effort will more than pay for itself. In fact, savings of 3 to 100 times the investment
is not unusual. The movement going on in the healthcare field adapted from the
Japanese manufacturers is commonly called “lean healthcare.” Perhaps you have
heard of some of the terms associated with it, like Kaisen events or poka-yoke. You
don’t have to be a master of these tools and terms to make good use of them,
though. Many are just applying logic with common sense.

The tools are best applied in efficient working teams or groups where some
problems with processes or outcomes are already agreed upon. If the working
group is larger than 3 or 4 people I suggest that one tool you use are string and 3
by 5 cards. You are going to use these to map out a process from beginning to end
and see if the group can find waste and suggest ways to eliminate it. Use the cards
to describe what physically happens during a process and use the string to connect
the activities that flow from one to another. For example, you might want to track a
patient in a doctor’s office coming in for a physical. The first card would represent
the patient’s encounter with the first staff person who records the patient’s
presence. From there, strings would indicate communicating with other pertinent
personnel of the patient’s presence and the ensuing events as well a string and card
that would indicate the patient waiting in the waiting room. In all of these mappings
you should be thinking of what you would like to use as variables to measure. You
certainly should be measuring time by all involved parties. You might also want to
count the number of successes/failures in communications. Many unintended
consequences occur at transition points and handoff points due to poor
communication. You might count if a supply was missing and someone had to
scurry to find another one. You will want to later find the mean and standard
deviations of these measures. The goal is achieve a target mean with as small as
possible standard deviation. For example, you should have 0 as a target for the
number of times a supply was missing.

After reaching a mapping that all agree represents as best as possible the present
flow of events, the group should brain storm ways to improve the flow. The goal is
to find a significantly better path. If a consensus is reached, fine; implement it. If
not, then perhaps you will want to try the various ways and then decide which is
best, based upon agreed upon measures of outcomes.

Once an optimized process is developed by the staff, you should write it down.
Make it a standard operating procedure and try to have all involved parties adopt it.
You might want to allow a little bit of wiggle room for individual differences in
performing a task; the goal of a common target with small standard deviation
should the goal of all, though.

Another tool to use is open communication. Too often a staff person or nurse will
see some event unfolding that will lead to poor outcomes. If the work environment
is not conducive to positive communicationcommunication which does not result
in negative outcomes for the reporting individualmistakes and waste will always
occur that could easily have been prevented. To reach a high level of positive
communication, the leaders at a site must work long and patiently to build trust. It
is not easy to do, but the payoffs are tremendous. Everyone wins!

Most healthcare leaders think of quality improvement as applying to activities that
directly involve the patient. However, the best healthcare providers use these tools
and others to evaluate all the processes at a healthcare site. The admissions and
billings departments are ripe targets, for instance. The result will be happier, more
motivated employees who are working more efficiently. In fact, sites which were
experiencing a shortage of staff often finding themselves well staffed because of
quality improvement processes. I do suggest that you promise all employees
involved in these processes that you guarantee there will be no layoffs. Doing so
will produce better outcomes.

If you want more examples of system wide applications of quality improvement in
healthcare facilities, I suggest that you go to the Baldrige Award site on the internet
and read the success stories of winners. Their results will amaze you, I promise.

I hope that you seriously consider adopting these tools and research other methods.
Many are described at various healthcare sites. Two of my favorites are Institute for
Healthcare Improvement and the American Academy of Family Physicians.

Donald Bryant helps healthcare providers meet their challenges and writes
“Making Good Healthcare Better” a free monthly ezine for healthcare
providers who want to dramatically improve patient health, improve the
bottom line, and make work more rewarding, guaranteed. Go now to
http://www.bryantsstatisticalconsulting.com to get a free article with tips you can
use to start making improvements immediately and to learn more about Lean Healthcare

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted in healthcare | No Comments »

Next Entries »

Close
E-mail It